Field mint 薄荷

Pharmaceutical nameMenthae Herba

Evidence grade: Not gradedSafety signal: Adverse-event literature existsMapping confidence: Strong correspondence

The three axes are assessed independently and are never combined into a single score.

KTKP records the origin species as Mentha arvensis var. piperascens Makinv.. It has not yet been cross-checked against the Korean Pharmacopoeia, so the identification confidence is not raised to an official code mapping. The same drug appears under 2 records as name variants. The same source species also yields 1 other separately registered drug(s) (Menthae Oleum), which must not be conflated. The name most used for this taxon in current literature is Mentha canadensis. Literature searches for this herb also cover Mentha haplocalyx, Mentha arvensis var. piperascens — the same taxon appears under several names. The nomenclatural discussion for this herb was flagged for correction during verification; only the verified facts are shown here, with the details in docs/HERB_NAME_RESEARCH.md.

Tradition · what the text describes

탕액편

The sub-section within this volume has not been verified against the original text yet.

The KTKP traditional materia medica record (M0001282) gives the origin species as Mentha arvensis var. piperascens Makinv., the part used as 지상부, and the properties as 무독(無毒), 신(辛), 양(凉). It lists 간(肝), 폐(肺) as the channels entered. The same record cites the Donguibogam (1613) as the source for its indications.

Properties & channel entry: 무독(無毒), 신(辛), 양(凉) · 간(肝), 폐(肺)

Source species: Mentha arvensis var. piperascens Makinv. (지상부)

Read the original: Korean Medicine Classics DB

Modern · documented evidence

(no indication derived — herb-name-only search)evidence for this indication

Evidence grade: Not graded
  • No indication is specified. A and B grades cannot be assigned until the query is narrowed to a specific indication.
  • No indication could be derived: no condition appears on two or more registered trials for this herb.

Literature

SR 0 · RCT 0 · preclinical 29

These counts come from a herb-name-only search (0 systematic reviews, 0 RCTs). Without a specific indication they show how much the herb has been studied, not what it works for.

Query used

We publish the exact query behind these counts so you can reproduce them yourself.

SRC:MED AND ((TITLE_ABS:"Mentha canadensis") OR (TITLE_ABS:"Mentha haplocalyx") OR (TITLE_ABS:"Mentha arvensis var. piperascens"))

Clinical trials

  • No registered trials.

Safety

auto-proposed · unreviewed

  • 2 adverse-event or toxicity record(s) were found. This only flags that literature exists — read the abstracts to decide between "caution" and "harm confirmed".
  • The KTKP record states the following traditional contraindication: 음허발열(陰虛發熱)과 해수자한(咳嗽自汗), 한다(汗多) 및 표허(表虛)에는 복용을 기(忌)한다. 또한 유즙분비저하(乳汁分泌低下)의 부작용이 있으므로 일반적으로 수유(授乳)중인 부인(婦人)에게는 사용하지 않는다. 음허혈조(陰虛血燥), 간양편항(肝陽偏亢), 표허한다자(表虛汗多者)는 복용해서 안 됨.

Adverse-event and toxicity literature

This is not a finding of harm — it lists literature that is retrievable. Read the papers to decide.

Sources

Bridges from here

In formulas
거풍지보단 · 방풍통성산
Related patterns
Wind-heat pattern