Sources and methodology

Editorial policy in full

1The three-axis system

Most services collapse everything into one axis: does it work or not. There are really three independent questions, and we never combine them into a single score.

Axis A · Evidence grade

AEstablishedConsistent efficacy in systematic reviews or multiple well-designed RCTs
BPromisingA few RCTs exist but are small or inconsistent; or a review concludes "possible"
CPreclinical onlyIn vitro or animal studies only. No human clinical evidence
DInsufficientLittle or no human research. This means "not yet studied", not "does not work"
EEvidence againstWell-designed studies show no effect, or harms outweigh benefits

Axis B · Safety signal

Harm confirmedRegulatory action or clear reports of human harm
CautionContraindicated or requires caution in pregnancy, lactation, children, or specific conditions
Adverse-event literature existsLiterature on adverse events, toxicity or poisoning exists. Not a finding of harm — a pointer to what must be read
Interaction literature existsInteraction literature exists. This is a literature pointer, not an interaction checker
Not yet assessedModern safety sources (NCCIH, LiverTox) have not been consulted yet. This means not yet checked — not that nothing was found.
No signal foundNo reports found within the sources searched. This is not a guarantee of safety

Axis C · Mapping confidence

◇◇◇Analogical onlyConceptual analogy only. These must not be treated as equivalent
◆◇◇Partial overlapOnly some symptoms overlap; the traditional concept is broader or narrower
◆◆◇Strong correspondenceNo official mapping, but symptom clusters and pathophysiology largely align in the literature
◆◆◆Official code mappingOfficial correspondence registered in KCD U-codes or the KTKP mapping dataset

2How evidence grades are derived

  1. We run a per-item query against Europe PMC and count the pubType distribution (systematic review / RCT / preclinical).
  2. We check the number of registered studies on ClinicalTrials.gov.
  3. From those counts alone we propose a draft grade, shown as "unreviewed".
  4. A curator reads the abstracts before a grade is finalised. Grade E is never assigned automatically.
  5. The exact query is published with each item so you can reproduce it.

3Data sources · Licence notices

This table is generated from the source registry in code, so the documentation cannot drift from the implementation.

SourceLicenceRedistributionCommercial
Europe PMC REST논문별 상이 (응답의 license 필드로 판별)Metadata onlyconditional
ClinicalTrials.gov API v2Public Domain (U.S. Government work)Full redistributionyes
OpenAlexCC0Full redistributionyes
NCCIH Herbs at a GlancePublic Domain (복제 권장)Full redistributionyes
KTKP Korean–Western disorder mapping (15059048)공공누리 제4유형 (출처표시 · 상업적 이용금지 · 변경금지)Metadata onlyno
KTKP materia medica (15002148)이용허락범위 제한 없음 (공공누리 유형 미표시)Full redistributionconditional
KTKP formulas (15057537)이용허락범위 제한 없음 (공공누리 유형 미표시)Full redistributionconditional
LiverToxPublic DomainFull redistributionyes
NIKOM/NCKM Clinical Practice Guidelines저작권법 보호 저작물 — 조건부 무료 열람·이용 (일괄 재배포 허락 아님)Link only (no mirroring)no
World Flora Online Plant ListCC0Full redistributionyes
PubChem PUG-RESTNCBI 무저작권 주장Full redistributionyes
WHO ICD-11CC BY-ND 3.0 IGOMetadata onlyconditional
KCD Korean Medicine U-codes통계청 고시 (공공 분류체계)Full redistributionyes
Korean Medicine Classics DBKIOM 저작권 — 재가공·유사서비스·AI 학습 금지Link only (no mirroring)no
MSK About HerbsAll rights reserved — 데이터 추출·마이닝 일체 금지Link only (no mirroring)no
Korea Traditional Knowledge Portalrobots.txt 에서 일반 크롤러 전면 차단Link only (no mirroring)unknown
KIOM OASISKIOM 저작권, API 없음Link only (no mirroring)no
Cochrane Library구독 기반, API 없음Link only (no mirroring)no
local resources/ — LLM-generated English edition of Donguibogam scans (unverified)프로젝트 소유 (원저작물은 퍼블릭 도메인)Full redistributionyes

4Editorial policy

  1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Grade D is never written up as "does not work".
  2. Historical and modern claims are grammatically separated: "the text describes…" versus "a 2023 systematic review reported…".
  3. Every evidence claim carries a clickable source. Unsourced efficacy statements are not published.
  4. Safety information is always shown, independent of the evidence grade.
  5. A disclaimer appears on every detail page.
  6. Automatically derived grades are always labelled "unreviewed".
  7. We neither advocate for nor dismiss traditional medicine. We show the state of the evidence.