Perilla leaf 紫蘇葉

Pharmaceutical namePerillae Folium

Evidence grade: Promisingauto-proposed · unreviewedSafety signal: Adverse-event literature existsMapping confidence: Strong correspondence

The three axes are assessed independently and are never combined into a single score.

KTKP records the origin species as Perilla frutescens (L.) Brit.. It has not yet been cross-checked against the Korean Pharmacopoeia, so the identification confidence is not raised to an official code mapping. The same drug appears under 2 records as name variants. The same source species also yields 7 other separately registered drug(s) (Perilliae Semen, Perillae Caulis, Perilla Herba, Perilla Folium, Perillae Frutescens Semen, Perillae Herba, Perillae Frutescens Folium), which must not be conflated. The name most used for this taxon in current literature is Perilla frutescens. Literature searches for this herb also cover Perilla frutescens var. crispa, Perilla frutescens var. acuta, Perilla ocymoides — the same taxon appears under several names. The nomenclatural discussion for this herb was flagged for correction during verification; only the verified facts are shown here, with the details in docs/HERB_NAME_RESEARCH.md.

Tradition · what the text describes

탕액편

The sub-section within this volume has not been verified against the original text yet.

The KTKP traditional materia medica record (M0003098) gives the origin species as Perilla frutescens (L.) Brit., the part used as 잎, and the properties as 신(辛), 온(溫). It lists 비(脾), 심(心) as the channels entered. The same record cites the Donguibogam (1613) as the source for its indications.

Properties & channel entry: 신(辛), 온(溫) · 비(脾), 심(心)

Source species: Perilla frutescens (L.) Brit. ()

Read the original: Korean Medicine Classics DB

Modern · documented evidence

Allergic Rhinitisevidence for this indication

Evidence grade: Promisingauto-proposed · unreviewed
  • The indication was derived automatically from the Condition field of 2 registered trial(s). It reflects what is currently being studied, not a traditional use, and a curator should confirm the label is apt.

Literature

SR 2 · RCT 1 · preclinical 3

2 systematic review(s) and 1 RCT(s) were found. Size and consistency are not yet assessed.

Query used

We publish the exact query behind these counts so you can reproduce them yourself.

SRC:MED AND ((TITLE_ABS:"Perilla frutescens") OR (TITLE_ABS:"Perilla frutescens var. crispa") OR (TITLE_ABS:"Perilla frutescens var. acuta") OR (TITLE_ABS:"Perilla ocymoides")) AND TITLE_ABS:"Allergic Rhinitis"

Clinical trials

Safety

auto-proposed · unreviewed

  • 13 adverse-event or toxicity record(s) were found. This only flags that literature exists — read the abstracts to decide between "caution" and "harm confirmed".
  • 1 interaction-related record(s) are retrievable. This flags that literature exists — it is not an interaction checker (§3.4).
  • The KTKP record states the following traditional contraindication: 복용 중 잉어를 먹지 말 것. 온병(溫病), 허약과로자(虛弱過勞者)는 먹지 말 것.

Adverse-event and toxicity literature

This is not a finding of harm — it lists literature that is retrievable. Read the papers to decide.

Interaction literature

This lists literature that is retrievable — it is not a judgement that an interaction exists. Read the papers to decide.

Sources

Bridges from here

In formulas
일복산