담적(痰積)증후군 담적(痰積)증후군

Where they diverge

Traditional concepts do not map one-to-one onto modern diagnoses. Read the divergence note first.

The traditional concept is broader: it presupposes a mechanism of congealed phlegm and groups digestive with systemic symptoms under it. Conversely ICD-11 functional dyspepsia is applied only after organic causes are excluded, and the traditional syndrome carries no such requirement. Confidence is low here — peer-reviewed literature on this syndrome is sparse.

• Research confidence: low. The full assessment, in Korean, is in docs/PATTERN_RESEARCH_KCD_DISEASES.md.
• The modern correspondences come from literature research, not from an official KCD or KTKP mapping, so the highest mapping confidence is not assigned.
• Full evidence and citations are in docs/PATTERN_RESEARCH_KCD_DISEASES.md.
• KCD does not carry the Donguibogam volume, so it is left blank here. It needs checking against the original text.
• 6 question(s) the research could not settle — see the research document.