Traditional concepts do not map one-to-one onto modern diagnoses. Read the divergence note first.
The traditional concept is broader: it attributes the complaint to retained food, so the name carries not only the symptom of indigestion but a causal attribution.
Conversely ICD-11 functional dyspepsia is a diagnosis of exclusion — organic causes must be ruled out, typically by endoscopy, and symptoms must persist for a defined period. The traditional name carries neither the exclusion requirement nor the duration criterion.
Mapping confidence: ◆◇◇Partial overlapbasis: literatureauto-generated · not individually reviewed
Research confidence: medium. The full assessment, in Korean, is in docs/PATTERN_RESEARCH_KCD_DISEASES.md.
The modern correspondences come from literature research, not from an official KCD or KTKP mapping, so the highest mapping confidence is not assigned.
Full evidence and citations are in docs/PATTERN_RESEARCH_KCD_DISEASES.md.
KCD does not carry the Donguibogam volume, so it is left blank here. It needs checking against the original text.
4 question(s) the research could not settle — see the research document.
Tradition · what the text describes
Traditional pattern
식적 食積
The Donguibogam volume for this entry is unverified — KCD does not carry it.
Bridge · linked via official codes
Official codes
KCD U86.8식적(食積) · Korean Medicine disease name
Modern · documented evidence
Modern diagnosis
DD90.3Functional dyspepsia
Diagnosis names are WHO ICD-11’s own wording. Any second line is our description, not an ICD-11 label.